911
iraq war
not only war funding but also oil assets of iraq going to evil handlers’ allies– but i think that those companies who got advantages over iraq war oils are not just neoconservatives but also dem oil evil handlers.. why?? because these korean evils who have microphone bugging devices that possibly implanted by american evil handlers and korean evil terrorists without my knowledge and permission do most of business with dem oil evil handlers. they confused that it is neoconservative and low tone evil in my left hand side just laughed very hard.. so.. i think that most oil evils who do evil things to me together with medical device microphone bugging evils and serail kiling prostitutes-microphones-pimping evils are mostly dem oil evils.
=====================
NICKANME FUTURE FUGHTER PEOPLE CAME? BAD PEOPLE OR GOOD PEOPLE??
================
SUE KIM YONG TAE FOR RAPE IF ANONYMOUS TIPS ARE TRUE.. THAT EVILS REALLY IMPLANTED MEDICAL DEVICES TO ME?? THEY START INVESTIGATION – MONEY TRANSACTIONS/ PHONE CALL HISTORIES AND SO ON
online search
some consultation with free lawyers
report mn fbi??
because i was in mn??
=============
lockheed martin
after 1996 merge, they re-did something till 1997-8?? with boeing and james something company – i forgot the company name??
i heard some people say about this when i washed dishes tonight
or korean evils bugging serial killing terrorists confused me?? was it also lockheed martin that killed the guy who really cared about me in 2008 or 2009 when i lived in vermont?? late 2008.. han choi and this high tone voice said ‘ they should have done this in 10+ years ago’ this guy who cared about me and got killed had no parents or siblings.
so… they killed him or did not kill him but made double?? and then, there was a distantly related relative. and so on.. they kill this relative as well?? or they knew that other people knew about this relative and did something?? there was something abut this… was it about lockheed martin?? or something else?? someone just said this… now… so, it could be lockheed martin??
=======================
William Kristol (born December 23, 1952) is an American neoconservative political analyst and commentator. He is the founder and editor of the political magazine The Weekly Standard, a regular commentator on the Fox News Channel, and a former op-ed columnist for the New York Times.
Totally opposed to my idea, which is that rich people use evil tactics to manipulate legislations and other financial systems to make more money, then at least govenment should protect middle and low classes – definitions of them are that they make less money than high class.
Kristol is associated with a number of prominent conservative think tanks: He was chairman of the New Citizenship Project from 1997 to 2005, he cofounded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in 1997 with Robert Kagan, he is a member of the board of trustees for the free-market Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, and he is a member of the Policy Advisory Board for the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He is also one of the three board members of Keep America Safe, co-founded by Liz Cheney and Debra Burlingame.
In 1998, president clinton made a law about iraq liberation?? possible that he compromised because of lewinsky scandal?? what kinds of laws are they?
The PNAC also supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (H.R.4655), which President Clinton had signed into law.
————
Calls for regime change in Iraq during Clinton years
The goal of regime change in Iraq remained the consistent position of PNAC throughout the 1997-2000 Iraq disarmament crisis.[6][7] They followed that up with a letter to Republican members of the U.S. Congress Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott.[8]
The PNAC also supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (H.R.4655), which President Clinton had signed into law.[9]
On January 16, 1998, following perceived Iraqi unwillingness to co-operate with UN weapons inspections, members of the PNAC, including Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Robert Zoellick drafted an open letter to President Bill Clinton, posted on its website, urging President Clinton to remove Saddam Hussein from power using U.S. diplomatic, political, and military power. The signers argue that Saddam would pose a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies, and oil resources in the region, if he succeeded in maintaining what they asserted was a stockpile of Weapons of Mass Destruction. They also state: “we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections” and “American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council.” They argue that an Iraq war would be justified by Hussein’s defiance of UN “containment” policy and his persistent threat to U.S. interests.[10]
On November 16, 1998, citing Iraq’s demand for the expulsion of UN weapons inspectors and the removal of Richard Butler as head of the inspections regime, Kristol called again for regime change in an editorial in his online magazine, The Weekly Standard: “…any sustained bombing and missile campaign against Iraq should be part of any overall political-military strategy aimed at removing Saddam from power.”[11] Kristol states that Paul Wolfowitz and others believed that the goal was to create “a ‘liberated zone’ in southern Iraq that would provide a safe haven where opponents of Saddam could rally and organize a credible alternative to the present regime … The liberated zone would have to be protected by U.S. military might, both from the air and, if necessary, on the ground.”
——-
In January 1999, the PNAC circulated a memo that criticized the December 1998 bombing of Iraq in Operation Desert Fox as ineffective, questioned the viability of Iraqi democratic opposition which the U.S. was supporting through the Iraq Liberation Act, and referred to any “containment” policy as an illusion.[12]
—————-
a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies, and oil resources in the region??? so, they even thought about iraq war in 1998. so what are the landscapes before-after iraq war??
——–
Rebuilding America’s Defenses
In September 2000, the PNAC published a controversial 90-page report entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century. The report, which lists as Project Chairmen Donald Kagan and Gary Schmitt and as Principal Author Thomas Donnelly, quotes from the PNAC’s June 1997 “Statement of Principles” and proceeds “from the belief that America should seek to preserve and extend its position of global leadership by maintaining the preeminence of U.S. military forces.”[13][14]
Donald Kagan and Gary Schmitt and Thomas Donnelly
————-
It specifies the following goals:
MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY, proceeding with the F-22 program while increasing purchases of lift, electronic support and other aircraft; expanding submarine and surface combatant fleets; purchasing Comanche helicopters and medium-weight ground vehicles for the Army, and the V-22 Osprey “tilt-rotor” aircraft for the Marine Corps.
CANCEL “ROADBLOCK” PROGRAMS such as the Joint Strike Fighter, CVX aircraft carrier,[15] and Crusader howitzer system that would absorb exorbitant amounts of Pentagon funding while providing limited improvements to current capabilities. Savings from these canceled programs should be used to spur the process of military transformation.
DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world.[16]
CONTROL THE NEW “INTERNATIONAL COMMONS” OF SPACE AND “CYBERSPACE,” and pave the way for the creation of a new military service – U.S. Space Forces – with the mission of space control.
EXPLOIT THE “REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS” to insure the long-term superiority of U.S. conventional forces. Establish a two-stage transformation process which
• maximizes the value of current weapons systems through the application of advanced technologies, and,
• produces more profound improvements in military capabilities, encourages competition between single services and joint-service experimentation efforts.
INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING gradually to a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually. (v)
I should find which projects belong to which companies??
——————
i am confused whether it is this letter or other kinds of letters that i heard from anonymous tips in vermont 2009
Post-9/11 call for regime change in Iraq
On September 20, 2001 (nine days after the September 11, 2001 attacks), the PNAC sent a letter to President George W. Bush, advocating “a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq,” or regime change:
…even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.[4][18]
From 2001 through 2002, the co-founders and other members of the PNAC published articles supporting the United States’ invasion of Iraq.[19] On its website, the PNAC promoted its point of view that leaving Saddam Hussein in power would be “surrender to terrorism.”[20][21][22][23]
In 2003, during the period leading up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the PNAC had seven full-time staff members in addition to its board of directors.[1]
———-
End of the organization
By the end of 2006, PNAC was “reduced to a voice-mail box and a ghostly website”, with “a single employee” “left to wrap things up”, according to the BBC News.[24] According to Tom Barry, “The glory days of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) quickly passed.”[25] In 2006, Gary Schmitt, former executive director of the PNAC, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and director of its program in Advanced Strategic Studies, stated that PNAC had come to a natural end:
When the project started, it was not intended to go forever. That is why we are shutting it down. We would have had to spend too much time raising money for it and it has already done its job. We felt at the time that there were flaws in American foreign policy, that it was neo-isolationist. We tried to resurrect a Reaganite policy. Our view has been adopted. Even during the Clinton administration we had an effect, with Madeleine Albright [then secretary of state] saying that the United States was ‘the indispensable nation’. But our ideas have not necessarily dominated. We did not have anyone sitting on Bush’s shoulder. So the work now is to see how they are implemented.[24]
PNAC was replaced by the Foreign Policy Initiative.
so… when i said.. it is mainly 1998-2006 where these evils were so active and said that after those were more like damage control time, somehow it sorts of fits to the life span of this organization… hmmmmm….. sometime 1997 or 1998 till 2006.. is this coincidence?? then, what i was more concerned about was that dem evil handlers recruited bush admin in 1997-8?? so, it is not just republicans… if i study these projects and landscapes before and after iraq war, will i be able to figure out about these evils behind of this- not just reps but also dems?? so.. then what about these evils impacts on me if my anonymous tips are true?? for example, during 1997-8 till 2006, who were those evils who had most impacts on my life, if anonymous tips are true??
what about this whole things’ relationships with martial laws?? remember about martial laws??
after martial laws, they were so confident and did lots of evil things to me.. then, after 2006 they were so confident again and did lots of evil things to me?? or when did i made police reports?? september 2006.. so, after police reports, these evils did more evil things to me, if all the anonymous tips are true.. i do not know whether some evils really did evil things to me or not… hmmmm… so… i was not able to report to police because
1. i do not remember anything.. all just depends on what i heard..
2. mostly evils controlled my consciousness?? so, is it good guys who made me make report to police or is it bad guys who made me make reports to police and then to fbi in 2008-now?? if it is good guys, then after 2006, things were getting better for me.. if it is bad evils, then… hmmm.. i am confused..
3. what about now?? hmmm… well.. i did get job offer.. but it was me who did not accept it because of possibility of evils manipulating my job environments.. so.. i can not tell whether it is good or bad…
——————
Ebrahim Afsah, in “Creed, Cabal, or Conspiracy – The Origins of the Current Neo-Conservative Revolution in US Strategic Thinking”, published in the German Law Journal, cited Jochen Bölsche’s view that the goal of the PNAC was world dominance or global hegemony by the United States.[30][31] According to Bölsche, Rebuilding America’s Defenses “was developed by Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Libby, and is devoted to matters of ‘maintaining US pre-eminence, thwarting rival powers and shaping the global security system according to US interests.
not to us interests but to several possible evil handlers interests..
find out about these people, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Libby
William Rivers Pitt, editorial director of Progressive Democrats of America, wrote, in an editorial published by Truthout.org, that PNAC was motivated by an imperial agenda of US military expansionism, which would bring negative side effects to ordinary citizens of the United States, while enriching some industries: “defense contractors who sup on American tax revenue will be handsomely paid for arming this new American empire.”[32]
George Monbiot, a political activist from the United Kingdom, stated: “…to pretend that this battle begins and ends in Iraq requires a willful denial of the context in which it occurs. That context is a blunt attempt by the superpower to reshape the world to suit itself.
but in vermont in 2008-9, according to what i heard, all these evils did all these evils things to me??? and these compromised evils connected to certain groups of dem politicians did all these evils things and spread out rumors that i encouraged illegal activities?? it was also dem evil politicians who set me up in 199x?? all based on what i heard…
so, it makes sense that evil dem handlers recruited handlers of bush and dick cheney for presidency in 2000, and they and these reps did 911 and weapon smuggling and oil laundering together??? all based on what i heard..
—————–
“New Pearl Harbor”
Section V of Rebuilding America’s Defenses, entitled “Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force”, includes the sentence: “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor” (51).[13]
In his appearance on Democracy Now!, theologian David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11, explains the allusion to “the New Pearl Harbor” from the PNAC report in the title of his book, which argues that PNAC members within the Bush Administration were complicit in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.[37]
Further information: 9/11 truth movement and Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[38][39][40] investigative journalist John Pilger, in The New Statesman,[41] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[42] all argue that PNAC members used the events as the “Pearl Harbor” that they needed––that is, as an “opportunity” to “capitalize on” (in Pilger’s words), in order to enact long-desired plans.[43]
“When the Towers came down,” William Rivers Pitt writes in his editorial in Truthout.org, “these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy.”[32]
—————
The Bradley Foundation has provided funding for the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). PNAC brought together prominent members of the (George W) Bush Administration (Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz) in the late 1990s to articulate their neoconservative foreign policy, including sending a letter to President Bill Clinton urging him to invade Iraq.
Bradley Foundation — suspicious
———-
He recently served on the board of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, an organization chaired by Joe Lieberman and John McCain designed to build bipartisan support for the invasion of Iraq. Marshall also signed, at the outset of the war, a letter issued by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) expressing support for the invasion. Marshall signed a similar letter sent to President Bush put out by the Social Democrats USA on Feb. 25, 2003, just before the invasion. The SDUSA letter urged Bush to commit to “maintaining substantial U.S. military forces in Iraq for as long as may be required to ensure a stable, representative regime is in place and functioning.”
================
check since when SK started tele- and oil
===============
William Kristol (born December 23, 1952) is an American neoconservative political analyst and commentator. He is the founder and editor of the political magazine The Weekly Standard, a regular commentator on the Fox News Channel, and a former op-ed columnist for the New York Times.
Totally opposed to my idea, which is that rich people use evil tactics to manipulate legislations and other financial systems to make more money, then at least govenment should protect middle and low classes – definitions of them are that they make less money than high class.
Kristol is associated with a number of prominent conservative think tanks: He was chairman of the New Citizenship Project from 1997 to 2005, he cofounded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in 1997 with Robert Kagan, he is a member of the board of trustees for the free-market Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, and he is a member of the Policy Advisory Board for the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He is also one of the three board members of Keep America Safe, co-founded by Liz Cheney and Debra Burlingame.
In 1998, president clinton made a law about iraq liberation?? possible that he compromised because of lewinsky scandal?? what kinds of laws are they?
The PNAC also supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (H.R.4655), which President Clinton had signed into law.
————
Calls for regime change in Iraq during Clinton years
The goal of regime change in Iraq remained the consistent position of PNAC throughout the 1997-2000 Iraq disarmament crisis.[6][7] They followed that up with a letter to Republican members of the U.S. Congress Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott.[8]
The PNAC also supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (H.R.4655), which President Clinton had signed into law.[9]
On January 16, 1998, following perceived Iraqi unwillingness to co-operate with UN weapons inspections, members of the PNAC, including Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Robert Zoellick drafted an open letter to President Bill Clinton, posted on its website, urging President Clinton to remove Saddam Hussein from power using U.S. diplomatic, political, and military power. The signers argue that Saddam would pose a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies, and oil resources in the region, if he succeeded in maintaining what they asserted was a stockpile of Weapons of Mass Destruction. They also state: “we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections” and “American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council.” They argue that an Iraq war would be justified by Hussein’s defiance of UN “containment” policy and his persistent threat to U.S. interests.[10]
On November 16, 1998, citing Iraq’s demand for the expulsion of UN weapons inspectors and the removal of Richard Butler as head of the inspections regime, Kristol called again for regime change in an editorial in his online magazine, The Weekly Standard: “…any sustained bombing and missile campaign against Iraq should be part of any overall political-military strategy aimed at removing Saddam from power.”[11] Kristol states that Paul Wolfowitz and others believed that the goal was to create “a ‘liberated zone’ in southern Iraq that would provide a safe haven where opponents of Saddam could rally and organize a credible alternative to the present regime … The liberated zone would have to be protected by U.S. military might, both from the air and, if necessary, on the ground.”
——-
In January 1999, the PNAC circulated a memo that criticized the December 1998 bombing of Iraq in Operation Desert Fox as ineffective, questioned the viability of Iraqi democratic opposition which the U.S. was supporting through the Iraq Liberation Act, and referred to any “containment” policy as an illusion.[12]
—————-
a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies, and oil resources in the region??? so, they even thought about iraq war in 1998. so what are the landscapes before-after iraq war??
——–
Rebuilding America’s Defenses
In September 2000, the PNAC published a controversial 90-page report entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century. The report, which lists as Project Chairmen Donald Kagan and Gary Schmitt and as Principal Author Thomas Donnelly, quotes from the PNAC’s June 1997 “Statement of Principles” and proceeds “from the belief that America should seek to preserve and extend its position of global leadership by maintaining the preeminence of U.S. military forces.”[13][14]
Donald Kagan and Gary Schmitt and Thomas Donnelly
————-
It specifies the following goals:
MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY, proceeding with the F-22 program while increasing purchases of lift, electronic support and other aircraft; expanding submarine and surface combatant fleets; purchasing Comanche helicopters and medium-weight ground vehicles for the Army, and the V-22 Osprey “tilt-rotor” aircraft for the Marine Corps.
CANCEL “ROADBLOCK” PROGRAMS such as the Joint Strike Fighter, CVX aircraft carrier,[15] and Crusader howitzer system that would absorb exorbitant amounts of Pentagon funding while providing limited improvements to current capabilities. Savings from these canceled programs should be used to spur the process of military transformation.
DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world.[16]
CONTROL THE NEW “INTERNATIONAL COMMONS” OF SPACE AND “CYBERSPACE,” and pave the way for the creation of a new military service – U.S. Space Forces – with the mission of space control.
EXPLOIT THE “REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS” to insure the long-term superiority of U.S. conventional forces. Establish a two-stage transformation process which
• maximizes the value of current weapons systems through the application of advanced technologies, and,
• produces more profound improvements in military capabilities, encourages competition between single services and joint-service experimentation efforts.
INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING gradually to a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually. (v)
I should find which projects belong to which companies??
——————
i am confused whether it is this letter or other kinds of letters that i heard from anonymous tips in vermont 2009
Post-9/11 call for regime change in Iraq
On September 20, 2001 (nine days after the September 11, 2001 attacks), the PNAC sent a letter to President George W. Bush, advocating “a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq,” or regime change:
…even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.[4][18]
From 2001 through 2002, the co-founders and other members of the PNAC published articles supporting the United States’ invasion of Iraq.[19] On its website, the PNAC promoted its point of view that leaving Saddam Hussein in power would be “surrender to terrorism.”[20][21][22][23]
In 2003, during the period leading up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the PNAC had seven full-time staff members in addition to its board of directors.[1]
———-
End of the organization
By the end of 2006, PNAC was “reduced to a voice-mail box and a ghostly website”, with “a single employee” “left to wrap things up”, according to the BBC News.[24] According to Tom Barry, “The glory days of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) quickly passed.”[25] In 2006, Gary Schmitt, former executive director of the PNAC, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and director of its program in Advanced Strategic Studies, stated that PNAC had come to a natural end:
When the project started, it was not intended to go forever. That is why we are shutting it down. We would have had to spend too much time raising money for it and it has already done its job. We felt at the time that there were flaws in American foreign policy, that it was neo-isolationist. We tried to resurrect a Reaganite policy. Our view has been adopted. Even during the Clinton administration we had an effect, with Madeleine Albright [then secretary of state] saying that the United States was ‘the indispensable nation’. But our ideas have not necessarily dominated. We did not have anyone sitting on Bush’s shoulder. So the work now is to see how they are implemented.[24]
PNAC was replaced by the Foreign Policy Initiative.
so… when i said.. it is mainly 1998-2006 where these evils were so active and said that after those were more like damage control time, somehow it sorts of fits to the life span of this organization… hmmmmm….. sometime 1997 or 1998 till 2006.. is this coincidence?? then, what i was more concerned about was that dem evil handlers recruited bush admin in 1997-8?? so, it is not just republicans… if i study these projects and landscapes before and after iraq war, will i be able to figure out about these evils behind of this- not just reps but also dems?? so.. then what about these evils impacts on me if my anonymous tips are true?? for example, during 1997-8 till 2006, who were those evils who had most impacts on my life, if anonymous tips are true??
what about this whole things’ relationships with martial laws?? remember about martial laws??
after martial laws, they were so confident and did lots of evil things to me.. then, after 2006 they were so confident again and did lots of evil things to me?? or when did i made police reports?? september 2006.. so, after police reports, these evils did more evil things to me, if all the anonymous tips are true.. i do not know whether some evils really did evil things to me or not… hmmmm… so… i was not able to report to police because
1. i do not remember anything.. all just depends on what i heard..
2. mostly evils controlled my consciousness?? so, is it good guys who made me make report to police or is it bad guys who made me make reports to police and then to fbi in 2008-now?? if it is good guys, then after 2006, things were getting better for me.. if it is bad evils, then… hmmm.. i am confused..
3. what about now?? hmmm… well.. i did get job offer.. but it was me who did not accept it because of possibility of evils manipulating my job environments.. so.. i can not tell whether it is good or bad…
——————
Ebrahim Afsah, in “Creed, Cabal, or Conspiracy – The Origins of the Current Neo-Conservative Revolution in US Strategic Thinking”, published in the German Law Journal, cited Jochen Bölsche’s view that the goal of the PNAC was world dominance or global hegemony by the United States.[30][31] According to Bölsche, Rebuilding America’s Defenses “was developed by Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Libby, and is devoted to matters of ‘maintaining US pre-eminence, thwarting rival powers and shaping the global security system according to US interests.
not to us interests but to several possible evil handlers interests..
find out about these people, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Libby
William Rivers Pitt, editorial director of Progressive Democrats of America, wrote, in an editorial published by Truthout.org, that PNAC was motivated by an imperial agenda of US military expansionism, which would bring negative side effects to ordinary citizens of the United States, while enriching some industries: “defense contractors who sup on American tax revenue will be handsomely paid for arming this new American empire.”[32]
George Monbiot, a political activist from the United Kingdom, stated: “…to pretend that this battle begins and ends in Iraq requires a willful denial of the context in which it occurs. That context is a blunt attempt by the superpower to reshape the world to suit itself.
but in vermont in 2008-9, according to what i heard, all these evils did all these evils things to me??? and these compromised evils connected to certain groups of dem politicians did all these evils things and spread out rumors that i encouraged illegal activities?? it was also dem evil politicians who set me up in 199x?? all based on what i heard…
so, it makes sense that evil dem handlers recruited handlers of bush and dick cheney for presidency in 2000, and they and these reps did 911 and weapon smuggling and oil laundering together??? all based on what i heard..
—————–
“New Pearl Harbor”
Section V of Rebuilding America’s Defenses, entitled “Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force”, includes the sentence: “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor” (51).[13]
In his appearance on Democracy Now!, theologian David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11, explains the allusion to “the New Pearl Harbor” from the PNAC report in the title of his book, which argues that PNAC members within the Bush Administration were complicit in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.[37]
Further information: 9/11 truth movement and Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[38][39][40] investigative journalist John Pilger, in The New Statesman,[41] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[42] all argue that PNAC members used the events as the “Pearl Harbor” that they needed––that is, as an “opportunity” to “capitalize on” (in Pilger’s words), in order to enact long-desired plans.[43]
“When the Towers came down,” William Rivers Pitt writes in his editorial in Truthout.org, “these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy.”[32]
—————
The Bradley Foundation has provided funding for the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). PNAC brought together prominent members of the (George W) Bush Administration (Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz) in the late 1990s to articulate their neoconservative foreign policy, including sending a letter to President Bill Clinton urging him to invade Iraq.
Bradley Foundation — suspicious
———-
He recently served on the board of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, an organization chaired by Joe Lieberman and John McCain designed to build bipartisan support for the invasion of Iraq. Marshall also signed, at the outset of the war, a letter issued by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) expressing support for the invasion. Marshall signed a similar letter sent to President Bush put out by the Social Democrats USA on Feb. 25, 2003, just before the invasion. The SDUSA letter urged Bush to commit to “maintaining substantial U.S. military forces in Iraq for as long as may be required to ensure a stable, representative regime is in place and functioning.”
