Archive for December, 2009

did i already post this?

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

according to what i heard..

all my postings are based on what i heard. it can be true or false.

I am trying to find the evil dem politicians who have hired and used medical device human experimentation- human trafficing evil women for the past 10+ years.. some of them possibly senators in dem and some of them possibly house reps in dem..

who are they?? some of them even shared the medical device human experimentation pimping money with human trafficing-human experimentation evils. i need to find who they are.. are the same evils pretend that they are netional security caring people? they only care for money and power – their greed and ambition. they only care about themselves. and they have worked for terrorist handlers!

————–

heritage or neoconservative?? i forget which parts in wikipedia i got the list.. Dick Cheney, Robert Kagan, Richard Perle, Kenneth Adelman and (Irving’s son) Bill Kristol all from wikipedia.. while reading many in wikipedia.com, i only selected something that i think that i might remember to hear through medical devices implanted in my ears without my knowledge or permission. the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), the New Democrat Network, and the Senate and House New Democrat Coalitions. Bill Clinton was the single Democratic politician of the 1990s most identified with the New Democrats; his promise of welfare reform in the 1992 presidential campaign, and its subsequent enactment, epitomized the New Democrat position, as were his 1992 promise of a middle-class tax cut and his 1993 expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit for the working poor.[4] New Democrat and Third Way successes under Clinton, and the writings of Anthony Giddens, are often regarded to have inspired Tony Blair in the United Kingdom and his moderate policies, which became the New Labour party.[9] Bill Clinton as proof of the viability of third way politicians and as a DLC success story — new democrats The DLC’s affiliated think tank is the Progressive Policy Institute dlc/ new democrats/ some other think tanks?? history – chair-vice chair- ceo — people around 1997-2000 ex) dlc chair-vice chair- ceo; former Representative Harold Ford of Tennessee, and its vice chair is Senator Thomas R. Carper of Delaware. Its CEO is Bruce Reed i do not remember dlc stuffs. but i do remember this — think tank – 1997-9 (possibly funding evil?? – ii can not connect their voice. but possible high tone voice pleased possibly funding evil about something think tank — could be dem — ??) which dem handler is oil-weapon handlers who set me up with terrorist encourage or something like that?? please see my video-clips.. i did not know that someone set me up in 10+ years ago till very recently.. again, i do not know whether my anonymous tips are true or false. i thought that this possibly evil (is this guy the same as funding evil???) recruited bush and cheney because most of dem politicians later took this compromised good handler’s side.. is he good?? he used to be good in 199x??.. but is he still good? that i do not know.. anyway, he was good guy but evil dem handlers set me up and later most dem politicians found out the truth and they took this compromised used-to-be good handler side. and then this evil dem handler (high guy – possibly weapon-oil guy??) put republican in charge – he supported republicans for next presidency. no?? maybe i am confused.. these people (dem handlers) who contacted republican handlers for the next presidency were weapon smuggling and oil laundering people.. by recruiting republicans, they were sure of expanding oil laundering capa or something like that??? am i confused?? well.. I am very confused and not sure whether the anonymous tips are true or false.. some could come from bugging evils?? it is not like i remember or anything.. it is solely based on what i heard. and the worst is that i can not distinguish good guys from bugging evils. anyway, according to what i heard, there were three handler groups in dem circles who knew me but i have no ideas of who they are. one – bad evil handlers who set me up, saying that i encouraged something terror activities or something because their side high people thought about doing terror in airport or something like that. they proposed the ideas to gov like pentagon but rejected.. they wanted to enhance airport securities in order for these freedome seekers (sons of families or people who know their dirty secrets or high tech capacities that could help their opposite side politicians or something like that) to sneak into the usa through airport. then anti-terrorists had conversational logs about their evil plans and threatened them that they would circulate it. so, they set me up, using medical devices implanted into my brain, ears, hearts, chest and so on – sort of making me say what they wanted me to say… they asked their lower workers to discuss these kinds of things with me, then i said that i am always opposed to the ideas of threatening their own citizens with false threats.. these kinds of evil tactics were used by south korean gov under dictatorships for nearly 40 years. anyway, so they set me up, saying that i encouraged some illegal activities or something?? then told the anti-terrorist people that if they circulate their logs, these evils will bring me down with them?? or something like that??? later, people found out the truth but these evils still managed to make people misunderstand me or something like that?? then, they got the political power so they started making evil medical device pimping evils made me available for rapes and ruined my life using medical devices implanted to me without my knowledge and permission. please look at my videoclips.. i do not know any of the anonymous tips are true or false. i do not have hard evidences.. anyway, together with some money evils, these evil dem handlers made dem politicians rape me. so this used-to-be good dem handler (a bit chubby??) decided not to be these rapist politicians handler anymore.. he sort of lost interest in politics.. there is another dem handler of weapon line.. this guy was together with nickname woman?? is this weapon line dem handler was before this chubby guy used-to-be-good handler or not?? i am so confused with all these… anyway, then, there is not-compromised good handler.. he never consider himself of any of dem handler. but he sometimes helped some politicians – several times??? maybe, i am very confused about the time-line.. this never-compromised good hanlder used to give some tips to weapon handler who was together with nickname woman?? and this used-to-be good handler was actually never compromised?? you know.. it is just so confusing… all based on what i heard.. anyway, my point is.. that high people of these evil dem handlers got pissed off because most dem politicians took used-to-be-good-handlers after they found out the truth.. so, high people of evil dem handlers took rep side??? but according to what i heard… evil dem handlers who did weapon smuggling and oil laundering put republicans in charge in order to expand oil laundering capa… hmmmm.. i am very very confused.. and what about the low tone evil dem handler who said that raping me is mendatory and to test criminability of their members?? that guy appeared in ear guy story?? high tone voice raised a politician – fat and young guy?? is this the same high tone voice?? this young and fat guy is dem?? and possibly Progressive Policy Institute — 2001-3 — more connected to low tone evil?? remember about obama change his position on membership of new democrats on march 2009 — started compromising to win?? — heard about this goship although after i read these dem groups, i more favored toward obama The DLC gave strong support for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Prior to the war, Will Marshall co-signed a letter to President Bush from the Project for the New American Century endorsing military action against Saddam Hussein. During the 2004 Primary campaign the DLC attacked Presidential candidate Howard Dean as an out-of-touch liberal because of Dean’s anti-war stance. The DLC dismissed other critics of the Iraq invasion such as filmmaker Michael Moore as members of the “loony left” [9]. Even as domestic support for the Iraq War plummeted in 2004 and 2005, Marshall called upon Democrats to balance their criticism of Bush’s handling of the Iraq War with praise for the President’s achievements and cautioned “Democrats need to be choosier about the political company they keep, distancing themselves from the pacifist and anti-American fringe.”[7] Joe Lieberman, another notable member of the DLC, endorsed Republican Senator John McCain for presidency in 2008??? heard about it.. he connected to low tone or funding evil? dick cheney is friend of funding evil, assuming that funding evil is the same guy – high guy of evil dem handler?? New Democrat Network, and the Senate and House New Democrat Coalitions. Bill Clinton was the single Democratic politician of the 1990s most identified with the New Democrats; his promise of welfare reform in the 1992 presidential campaign, and its subsequent enactment, epitomized the New Democrat position, as were his 1992 promise of a middle-class tax cut and his 1993 expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit for the working poor.[4] New Democrat and Third Way successes under Clinton, and the writings of Anthony Giddens, are often regarded to have inspired Tony Blair in the United Kingdom and his moderate policies, which became the New Labour party.[9] — weapon connected?? In 2006, Blue Dog candidates such as Jason Altmire, Heath Shuler and Brad Ellsworth were elected in conservative-leaning districts, ending years of Republican dominance in these areas. ———- “Blue Dog Democrat” is derived from the term “Yellow Dog Democrat.” Former Texas Democrat Rep. Pete Geren is credited fo

dream last night and do-to-list

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

what i wrote 3-4 days ago?

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

all my postings are based on anonymous tips. it can be true or false

bad media play by cnn

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

who will be in charge of investigating this bomb guy? someone should inject him with truth drug and break his brain with mri looking like machine to get the whole truth?? maybe CIA should do it?? and CIA should use the same investigation methods to detainees who were charged with al-qaeda connection??

it was my idea and i said it out when i was in vermont usa in 2009 many times.. now lower workers of terrorists who tried to get immunities for their crimes pretend that they are patriots by following my words that i already said out in vermont.. damn human experimentaiton human trafficing evils pretend that they are patriots.. circulate all the logs (audioclips and videoclips) of their crimes for the last 10 years. people should know the truth about them.. damn faking money psychotic human experimentation human trafficking evils.. do not use microphones in combination with other medical devices implanted to my brain and other parts of my body wihout my permission and knowledge.. good anonymous tippers should circulate all the hard evidences of these evils crimes.. these evils trying to buy immunities, pretending that they are patriots.. evils..

(CNN) — The father of terrorism suspect Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab talked about his son’s extremist views with someone from the CIA and a report was prepared, but the report was not circulated outside the agency, a reliable source told CNN’s Jeanne Meserve on Tuesday. Had that information been shared, the 23-year-old Nigerian who is alleged to have bungled an attempt to blow up a jetliner as it was landing in Detroit, Michigan, on Christmas Day might have been denied passage on the Northwest Airlines flight, the source said. U.S. officials said the father, a former Nigerian banker, expressed his concerns about his son’s radicalization during at least one meeting and several calls with officials at the embassy in Nigeria. The information on AbdulMutallab had been sent to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, but it sat there for five weeks and was not disseminated, the source said. Federal authorities have charged AbdulMutallab with trying to detonate explosives hidden in his underwear as the flight from Amsterdam, Netherlands, made its final approach to Detroit. The device failed to fully detonate, instead setting off a fire at his seat. Video: Obama: ‘Human and systemic failure’ Timeline: Terror suspect RELATED TOPICS Terrorism Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab Central Intelligence Agency An administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity said the federal government had information that should have been assessed and meshed with other information “that would have allowed us to disrupt the attempted terrorist attack” before the suspect boarded the jet. “What we have here is a situation in which the failings were individual, organizational, systemic and technological,” the official said. “We ended up in a situation where a single point of failure in the system put our security at risk, where human error was compounded by systemic deficiencies in a way that we cannot allow to continue.” But an intelligence official said that the son’s name, passport number and possible connection to extremists were indeed disseminated. “I’m not aware of a magic piece of intelligence somehow withheld that would have put AbdulMutallab on the no-fly list,” the official said. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said department staff did what they were supposed to have done by sending a cable to the National Counterterrorism Center in Washington about the matter. Kelly said any decision to have revoked the suspect’s visa would have been an interagency decision. But a U.S. government official said the information in the cable offered nothing specific and was just one of hundreds of such reports that the center evaluates daily. The bureaucratic fingerpointing erupted shortly after President Obama on Tuesday blamed “a mix of human and systemic failures” for the incident and directed that preliminary findings into the matter be delivered to the White House by Thursday.

dilema– fake patriots who are lower workers of terrorists

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

 

is it better to know who are these terrorists even if there is much possibilities that these terrorists are political handlers and information handlers in the USA and/ or in Korea??

Self-called patriot (I think that this person is a woman) woman who used to work for terrorists told people that it would harm national interests if they investigate terrorists (us/ korea handlers). it will destroy reputations of the usa and korea..

so, is it better option to put all the blames on innocent people and set them up? and just let these terrorists destroy all other innocent people for their interests using politicians, media, their people in government military and so on??

is it better to cover up all these crimes and protect terrorists and set up innocent people just because investigation may lead to national shame and some damage in international relations with other countries??

whoever argued and reasoned the above is afraid because she/ he herself/ himself worked for terrorists and know that good anonymous tippers (who have all these hard evidences) wont take their sides, because they are lower workers of terrorists. they are only afraid of their fame, their well-being, wealth, repuation, not the national interest or repuation of the usa or korea..

evils just faking that they are patriots who cared for national interest. but the truth is.. they are just lower workers of terrorists and only care about themselves.. sacrifying innocent people and protecting terrorists are much more easier for them to protect themselves than revealing truth and fixing things up..

the same evil said that it is better to cover up crimes of these lower workers of terrorits – medical device human experimentation human trafficing evils than destroy them. same evil’s idea that they should set me up for their crimes, rather than investigating my cases. who is this evil? lower worker of terrorist who is afraid of her/ his own crimes… used to work for terrorists. just recently fake in front of other people that they care for the usa, the national interest, and pretending that she/ he is a patriot. EVIL! histroy will judge you.

all my postings are based on what i heard. it can be true or false.

medical device evils.

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

according to what i heard, in 199x, evils implanted some medical devices into my heart without my permission and knowledge, and tested medical device(s) whether it could kill me in several minutes in front of good guy(s). they wanted to let him know their power on me. under medical definitions, I was killed in 199x because my heart was stopped more than 3 and half minutes. they had to inject medicines to my heart – the kind of medicines that astronauts bring with them when they go out to space. were those medical devices implanted to my heart under development at that time? who did implantation?? the thing is that these evils still have the medical device controllers that remotely kill me in several minutes.. all my postings are based on my anonymous tips. I do not know whether it is true or not.

from yahoo.com
Studies spotlight problems in FDA device approvals
 

        Buzz up!0 votes
Send
Email
IM
Share
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Fark
Newsvine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Twitter
Yahoo! Bookmarks
Print

By CARLA K. JOHNSON, AP Medical Writer Carla K. Johnson, Ap Medical Writer – Tue Dec 29, 11:24 pm ET
CHICAGO – Two new studies find shortfalls in the Food and Drug Administration’s approval process for heart devices such as pacemakers and stents.

Safety targets often weren’t clearly spelled out in the research submitted by device makers and important patient information was missing, according to one study conducted by researchers from the FDA and Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

A separate analysis by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, found heart devices frequently got the FDA’s blessing based on research done outside the United States in small groups of patients. Many device studies lacked standards most scientists expect: randomization and a clear goal.

Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, the FDA’s acting device center director, said the agency is taking a close look at its device program and making changes. It wants manufacturers to adhere to tougher research guidelines that will be out in 2010, Shuren said.

The FDA, the nation’s chief watchdog on device safety, approves products ranging from wrinkle fillers to artificial knees. Heart devices fall into a category of high-risk devices that require the toughest review before they can be marketed. They include implantable defibrillators, valves and stents, which are tiny mesh-metal tubes used to prop open arteries.

The new studies, published in separate medical journals, cap a year of scrutiny and criticism for the FDA’s medical devices division. In August, the head of that division resigned, months after scientists under his leadership alleged they were pressured to approve certain products. The year began with congressional investigators saying the FDA should take immediate steps to make sure the riskiest devices are approved through the most stringent process.

The new studies didn’t examine the safety of the approved devices, and didn’t look for differences in the approval process for items that were later recalled. Global sales for heart and blood vessel devices were nearly $76.7 billion in 2008, according to market research firm BCC Research.

One of the new studies, published online Tuesday in the American Journal of Therapeutics, found about 40 percent of pivotal studies lacked precise targets for how safety would be measured. Studies also failed to fully account for what happened to all patients enrolled in the research and omitted important information on patients such as how many had heart disease or diabetes.

“Companies need to better define precisely what they’re measuring and at what time point they intend to measure it,” said study co-author Dr. William Maisel, director of the nonprofit Medical Device Safety Institute at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The analysis looked at the research behind 88 heart and blood vessel devices.

Maisel was an FDA consultant and another Beth Israel author was in an FDA fellowship program when the study was done. The FDA cleared their participation after conflict-of-interest screening. Three other authors are FDA staffers.

The second study appears in Wednesday’s Journal of the American Medical Association. Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco, examined summaries of the research behind 78 heart and blood vessel devices. It found that many devices were approved based on small studies — 300 patients on average — and two-thirds were approved with results of just one study.

“We were surprised at the number of devices approved without high quality evidence,” said study co-author Dr. Rita Redberg. The research was supported by the university’s medical school.

Both studies looked at devices approved from 2000-2007.

Much is at stake with device approval. In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court found that federal law bars patients from suing manufacturers for injuries caused by FDA-approved devices.

In contrast, consumers can sue drugmakers over FDA-approved drugs. Drugmakers submit rigorous studies when seeking approval of new drugs, generally they must submit large randomized studies.

Redberg said she believes new leaders at the FDA want to improve the approval process. She joined an advisory committee to the FDA on devices last year, after the years covered by the study.

In both new studies, the researchers looked only at so-called premarket approvals. They didn’t include devices cleared through an alternative FDA process — “510(k) submissions” — used for less risky devices that are substantially similar to approved devices. The FDA has asked the Institute of Medicine to review its 510(k) reviews, following criticism from safety advocates and government watchdogs.

FDA officials said the University of California researchers looked only at summaries of device approvals, rather than the full research. The FDA said the researchers also made faulty assumptions about device research, which is inherently different from drug research.

The most rigorous research randomly assigns patients to get either the experimental treatment or a standard treatment, or sometimes a placebo. Patients and sometimes doctors are “blinded,” meaning they don’t know which patients receive the experimental treatment.

FDA officials said requiring randomized studies for second and third generation devices would delay bringing engineering refinements to the market. They said it’s often impossible to conduct blinded studies with devices.

hope that final bill includes pub. option

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

The biggest difference between the two bills is the public option. The House bill has one; the Senate bill does not.

 

from cnn

 

 

terrorists set me up?

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

20080815230348-4

terrorists set me up

videolink to myspace.com

why it does show in myspace.com? i can not play it?

all based on what i heard and some reminders of what i heard long time ago. terrorists set me up because i encouraged anti-terrorists to fight against terrorists when they put me under medical device influences and asked me things? level 1 anti-terrorists fought against terrorists and lost. some left the usa and some remained. those who remained were forced to attend meetings with terrorists. terrorists implanted medical devices to me that could kill me instantly. then, there were other fights – level 2 anti-terrorists fought against terrorists. some called for investigation. some investigation connected people and terrorists plot to set up anti-terrorists. real terrorists did not show up in the meeting and anti-terrorists show up in the meeting? some anti-terrorists did not show up because they got phone calls? is this 2nd level fight or 3rd level fight? was this about weapon smuggling and oil laundering or something else?? i am kind of confused.. but if good people have hard evidences = 1000s of logs = audioclips and videoclips – of investigation connected terrorists doing terrorist activities together with real terrorists for the last 10 years, then those several logs of meetings where anti-terrorists were forced to attend the meeting because they lost, does not mean anything, right?? same goes for me.. if my anonyous tips are true, and people have logs of how these evils set me up (put me under medical device influences and used medical devices implanted in my brain, ears, chest, heart, other parts of my body) to manipulate me – make me say what they wanted to me say, and i do not have memory at all of what happened of times these evils put me under medical device influences, how can you say that i encouraged terror activities?? they made senarios and put me under medical device influences and made me say what’s in the senarios, for example??

videoclip and picture – terrorists set me up?

Monday, December 28th, 2009

terrorists set me up – video clips, fbi reports, doj reports, postings and etc to vatican pope, cia, fbi, interpole, iaea, korean police

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

order 1-6
last three digits
1: 544
2: 549
3: 650(1)
4: 853
5: 206
6: 427
 
—————————
 
terrorists set me up
i did not know that terrorists set me up in 10+ years ago. recently some politician hired medical device evil pimping female prostutite and lower workers of terrorists male evil groups (possibly lower workers of terrorists) tried to set me up again. i would like to post what i heard from anonymous tips. if anybody has tried to set me up for many times since 199x till now, that means that my anonymous tips could be very true. all my postings including videoclips are based on what i heard. it can be true or false.